2019 FAQ's - Submitting Proposals
- Proposal Submission
- My topic is __________. Which strand should I apply to?
- Which type of proposal (individual paper, poster, roundtable, or one- or two-hour colloquium) should I submit?
- Should I include a reference list in my submission? If I do include it, does it count towards my word limit?
- Can I submit a proposal if I am a Strand Coordinator?
- Can I submit a proposal to the strand for which I am serving as a proposal reviewer?
- What is required to submit a proposal for a colloquium?
- Should the colloquium proposal list the contributors’ names?
- What is the difference between an organizer and a discussant for the colloquia?
- How many presentations should be in a colloquium?
- Editing A Proposal Submission
- When will I hear whether or not my proposal has been accepted?
- If my proposal is accepted, will my registration fee be waived?
- What if my proposal isn’t accepted? Will I be told why?
- How can I access the reviewers’ comments about my proposal?
- Can my proposal be reconsidered if it is not accepted?
- I didn’t receive confirmation. Why not?
- I cannot see the reviewer’s comments. Why?
- How can I get more information on the reviews of my proposal?
- I submitted a proposal for an individual paper, but it was accepted as a poster presentation or roundtable session instead. Is it possible that my presentation will be changed to an individual paper at some point?
Please read the brief descriptors for each strand, which are available through the Call for Proposals on the AAAL website.
Try to submit your proposal to the strand that most closely relates to your main theme. If you are unsure, please ask a colleague, professor, or supervisor who is familiar with AAAL Conference procedures.
You can submit a proposal to give an individual paper if you feel your work is complete and ready for a more comprehensive presentation of your research.
Roundtable sessions and poster presentations are well suited for works in progress. They generate interactive discussions with people who are particularly interested in your topic and thus offer valuable feedback and networking opportunities.
In a roundtable session, typically one presenter speaks to a small audience (typically 8 - 10 people) seated around a table, all of whom have chosen to attend that particular session. The 15-minute presentation is followed by a whole-group discussion of the work, in which all participants have opportunities to contribute.
There are many concurrent roundtables happening in the same room, but participants attend only one.
Poster presentations are especially useful for data that can be presented visually (e.g., charts, transcripts, linguistic landscape data, semiotic and multimodal analysis). They allow for much more sustained discussion and in-depth comments than formal papers.
Colloquia are multi-person discussions of a topic. The purpose of this format is to foster dialogue among attendees, so generous time allowance should be made throughout the colloquium for extended audience discussion of the papers presented. Colloquium organizers serve as the liaisons between participants in the colloquium and the program committee, and are therefore responsible for communication among the presenters and discussants.
This year, a one-hour colloquium format has been created as an alternative to the shorter paper presentations of previous years. This presentation format encourages conciseness and focus and allows more time for discussion than the longer paper presentations. Sessions in this format will consist of three individual ten-minute papers within a one-hour time slot. Each paper is allocated up to two minutes for clarification questions, followed by 20-25 minutes of discussion after all three papers have been presented. Previously, the thematic linking of the three papers in the session was made by the AAAL conference organizing committee. This year, one or more of the authors of the three papers will serve as the colloquium organizer(s). Proposals should consist of the theme and the three papers addressing the theme. Please note that one-hour colloquia should not include an additional presenter in a “discussant” role; the discussion is managed by the authors of the three papers.
Please refer to the Call for Proposals for further details.
Individuals may submit a maximum of one abstract as first author, whether a paper (including shorter papers and papers presented in a colloquium), a poster, or a roundtable session. An individual may appear as a first author only once on the program. First authors are expected to present the research bearing their name, but all authors are encouraged to share in the presentation of co-authored research.
An individual may take on an additional role as a colloquium organizer or discussant. For papers, an individual may also appear as a co-author/co-presenter of another paper, provided they are not first author.
A reference list is not required. If used, it will count towards your word limit, as will in-text citations. In-text citations can be important for situating your research, but because they do count towards the word limit, you will want to be selective in how many you include.
Yes you can, BUT you cannot submit a proposal to the strand you are coordinating. You are welcome to submit a proposal to another strand.
Yes, as a proposal reviewer you may submit a proposal to ANY strand.
To submit a colloquium proposal you'll need a title, and abstracts for the colloquium as a whole, as well as for each of the individual papers. The colloquium organizer should submit the whole proposal. Colloquium organizers must gather all the relevant information from the other panelists before submitting a colloquium proposal.
Here is the information that you'll need from each panelist:
1. a title of no more than 20 words
2. an abstract of no more than 300 words
If you have discussants (two-hour colloquia only), abstracts and summaries are not expected from them.
Please refer to the Call for Proposals for further details.
No. In order to preserve the double-blind review process, names of individual contributors must not be listed in the larger colloquium proposal.
The organizer is responsible for planning and facilitating the colloquium. He or she creates and submits the larger proposal for the entire colloquium. The discussant is the person who draws connections between/among the presenters’ papers and often has questions, suggestions, or recommendations to add, as a way of further exploring the papers’ findings.
Remember that one-hour colloquia should not have a discussant.
Typically, two-hour colloquia have anywhere from 3-5 presentations. The one-hour colloquia must have three presentations.
The format of one-hour colloquia is more strict. In two-hour colloquia, the presenters decide how many presenters there will be and how long each will present. In the one-hour colloquia there are three ten-minute presentations that are thematically linked.
The shorter time limit for each paper forces greater focus and economy. The format also allows much greater time for discussion of the content of the papers presented. Each session lasts for 60 minutes, allowing the presentation of three ten-minute papers, with a minute or two after each for clarification questions, followed at the end of the three papers by thirty minutes for discussion of all three papers.
The one-hour colloquia is replacing the shorter paper presentations of previous years. In the past, AAAL organized shorter papers by theme. This year, three thematically-linked papers are submitted together.
You may prefer the greater opportunity for discussion of the content of your papers. Twenty-five minutes are allowed for the discussion of the three papers presented in a shorter paper session. The need to make the presentation economical and focused may also be attractive to some presenters. Shorter colloquia papers are considered full papers – there is no difference in the quality or the completeness of the research. This may prove an advantage in securing funding to attend the conference – some institutions will fund papers only, not roundtable or poster presentations.
The requirements are identical to the two-hour colloquium; that is, a title, an abstract, and keywords.
AAAL has experimented with a 10-minute format for the past two years, following the practice in some other academic disciplines where shorter presentations are more common. Scheduling three 10-minute talks by theme has proven challenging for the Conference Chair. In the new one-hour colloquium format, the grouping of the three papers is now done by the researchers themselves. From an organizational perspective, the format allows AAAL to accept slightly more papers in the time allowed – three per hour rather than two per hour for traditional length papers.
No, but, you may edit your proposal submission until the deadline. For the 2019 conference, the deadline is Monday, August 20, 2018 4:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time. NOTE THAT THIS DEADLINE IS SLIGHTLY EARLIER THAN IN PREVIOUS YEARS, TO ALLOW FOR GREATER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT DURING THE PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PERIOD.
Yes, up until August 20, 2018 for the 2019 conference. After this date you may no longer change a strand.
You can edit the proposal and add another presenter until the proposal deadline (August 20, 2018 for the 2019 AAAL Conference).
If you wish to change your own name (e.g., in the case of marriage, divorce, etc.) or affiliation, then you simply need to login to your profile on the AAAL website to change how your name appears in the membership records.
However, if you make the name change after the program has gone to press, the earlier version of your name may still appear in the program.
Notices of proposal acceptances and rejections usually go out in October or November. There is no exact date: the timing may vary from year to year, depending on the number of submissions, the space available on the program, and when the proposal reviewers complete the process.
No. All presenters who attend the conference are required to register. Co-authors who do not attend are not required to register.
Each year we receive a very high number of proposals for consideration. Given the limitations of time and space on the program, the acceptance rate is generally under 50%. As a result, the review process is particularly stringent, and acceptances are highly competitive.
Each proposal will be reviewed by two scholars specializing in the strand to which you submit your proposal. You will be able to access the reviewers’ comments (should they provide them) and ratings after the adjudication process is complete. Instructions for accessing your reviews will be provided in your proposal notification email.
Once the review process is complete, you will be provided with a link in the notification email, which will allow you to access the reviewers’ comments about your proposal.
No. Due to the large number of submissions, proposals cannot be reconsidered once the review process has closed.
If you are not the lead author who submitted a paper proposal, please check with that person. Only the submitter of the proposal will be notified; it is his or her responsibility to share information with co-presenters.
In the case of a colloquium, if you are not the organizer, you will not receive notification. It is up to the colloquium organizer to notify you.
Only the person who submitted the proposal will receive notification and have direct access to the reviews.
It is the submitter's responsibility to share this information with co-authors and/or panelists.
Due to the large number of submissions that must be reviewed, AAAL does not require our reviewers to provide comments for each proposal they adjudicate. Unfortunately, we cannot accommodate requests for further clarification or feedback.
I submitted a proposal for an individual paper, but it was accepted as a poster presentation or roundtable session instead. Is it possible that my presentation will be changed to an individual paper at some point?
If your proposal was submitted as an individual paper and then accepted as a poster or roundtable, we also placed it on the waiting list to be moved into the category of papers in case of cancellations. These changes will be made on the basis of the ranking received (scores and reviewers’ comments) on the original proposal.