AAAL Research Article Award
Call for Nominations
The AAAL Research Article award is bestowed annually upon the author or authors of a published refereed journal article which is rec¬ognized by leaders in the field to be of outstanding quality and to hold the broadest potential impact on the advancement of applied linguistic knowledge. This is a non-cash award consisting of a certificate presented to the author (a certificate will be presented to each author, if the winner is a multi-authored article).
Deadline for Submission: June 1, 2016
For questions regarding the web submission process, please email the AAAL Business Office at email@example.com.
Criteria for Evaluation. The article must meet the highest standards in social sciences or humanities research and advance applied linguistics knowledge. The award selection criteria include:
- Significance of the problem being addressed. The issues investigated are important to the field of applied linguistics and the study advances knowledge in an area that is highly valued by the research communities of AAAL.
- Use of compelling theory and cumulative research base. The literature review is well crafted, appropriately invoking or even innovating theories, and demonstrating deep understanding of the relevant accumulated research.
- Strength of research design. The study is well designed and follows the highest standards of inquiry for qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, employing instruments, techniques, and procedures that are rigorous and appropriate for the research questions posed.
- Appropriateness of interpretations. The interpretations are well grounded in the evidence and the limitations are discussed.
- Completeness of reporting. The level of detail of the reporting enables replication and/or theory building, as appropriate.
- Clarity and engagement of writing style. The article (including tables, figures, appendices, and supplementary online materials, if applicable) is well written, in a style that is both clear and engaging, such that readers’ level of understanding and interest is high.
- Promise for inspiring future research directions. The study holds great potential to serve as a model for future research; it opens up new ways to conduct research or new research questions to explore.
- Attention to context. The authors show a sophisticated awareness of the constraints and affordances that the specific local context of the research brings for the study.
- Potential to have an impact on language-related human and world problems. The study makes a contribution to knowledge about language that holds potential for improving the conditions of individuals, groups, and/or societies in the world, beyond the research.
- Attention to vulnerable, disadvantaged, or under-researched populations. In their study the authors show sensitivity towards vulnerable or disadvantaged populations or populations less frequently examined in research, and as a result the study strengthens the field’s capacity for building knowledge that is beneficial to such populations.
Instructions for Submission of Nominations. We call for outstanding research articles published during the previous calendar year. Candidate articles should be nominated by editors of peer-reviewed journals published within or outside of North America (both print and on-line and both inside and outside the field of applied linguistics); each journal can submit up to two nominations. Eligibility is not limited to authors who are AAAL members.
Please submit the nominated articles below by June 1st as pdf versions. The Award Committee cannot consider submissions that reach the office later than June 1st midnight, GMT Eastern Time.
The Award Committee consists of five members: one Executive Committee member, two presidential appointees, and two elected members, all with staggered two-year terms and representing a broad range of theoretical, methodological and epistemological backgrounds. The presidential appointments take into consideration the strengths of the elected members in order to balance/extend the coverage of the committee as a whole.
The Award Committee members will rate and rank the research articles submitted in a given year and then report their final decision to the Executive Committee. At the discretion of the Award Committee, the award may or may not be presented during a given year. A reason not to make an award would be an insufficient number of nominations, or no nominated article that meets the excellence expected.
View Evaluation Rubric